Farm Subsidy information
Amite County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Amite County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,273
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Amite County, Mississippi totaled $23,232,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Garry Randall | Summit, MS 39666 | $130,436 |
22 | George & Sammie Anglin Limited Pa | Magnolia, MS 39652 | $129,240 |
23 | Adams Land & Timber LLC | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $126,849 |
24 | Allen Jones Jr | Liberty, MS 39645 | $125,419 |
25 | Annie Laurie Wroten | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $123,918 |
26 | Conway C Bates | Mendenhall, MS 39114 | $119,820 |
27 | Mitchell Lee Wilson | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $113,087 |
28 | Margaret Adams | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $111,381 |
29 | David Morris Dixon III | Liberty, MS 39645 | $109,929 |
30 | Robert Earl Wroten | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $109,579 |
31 | Rickie Williams Jr | Magnolia, MS 39652 | $105,271 |
32 | John E Newman | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $103,889 |
33 | , | $103,370 | |
34 | Harry B Wells | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $100,847 |
35 | Southeast Cattle LLC | Independence, LA 70443 | $100,838 |
36 | Ivy Mcdaniel Jr | Magnolia, MS 39652 | $99,512 |
37 | Arliss Ike Williamson Jr | Meadville, MS 39653 | $98,993 |
38 | , | $95,876 | |
39 | Bobby L Caston | Greenwell Springs, LA 70739 | $93,215 |
40 | Trask Family Partners Lp | Baton Rouge, LA 70810 | $86,738 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”