Conservation Reserve Program in Attala County, Mississippi, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 159
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Attala County, Mississippi totaled $540,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | William R Cade Jr | Winona, MS 38967 | $1,351 |
82 | Edwin Dale Brasher Sr Estate | Winfield, AL 35594 | $1,324 |
83 | Ronny Estes | Sallis, MS 39160 | $1,317 |
84 | Ray Jenkins | Indianola, MS 38751 | $1,171 |
85 | Steven Allen | Kosciusko, MS 39090 | $1,159 |
86 | Charles F Burrell | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $1,155 |
87 | Geraldine Dennis | Cherokee Village, AR 72529 | $1,154 |
88 | , | $1,132 | |
89 | James Donald Williams | French Camp, MS 39745 | $1,096 |
90 | H & H Farm | Kosciusko, MS 39090 | $1,088 |
91 | Rayborn White | Kosciusko, MS 39090 | $1,079 |
92 | Humberto Garcia | Kosciusko, MS 39090 | $1,074 |
93 | John N Barber | Sallis, MS 39160 | $1,064 |
94 | Sammy E Townsend | Columbus, MS 39702 | $1,052 |
95 | Adrian Whittington | Madison, MS 39110 | $1,033 |
96 | John Morris Ward | Kosciusko, MS 39090 | $1,004 |
97 | Daniel Danny Cochran | Carthage, MS 39051 | $973 |
98 | Rickey D Myers | Kosciusko, MS 39090 | $914 |
99 | Henry P Fancher | Louisville, MS 39339 | $900 |
100 | Gloria Cotton Vance | Sallis, MS 39160 | $870 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”