Farm Subsidy information
Bolivar County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Bolivar County, Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 371
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bolivar County, Mississippi totaled $23,920,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Stacy Hale Farms Partnership | Rosedale, MS 38769 | $68,065 |
42 | Lagniappe Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $66,247 |
43 | The Jefferson Bank ** | Greenville, MS 38704 | $66,171 |
44 | Pongetti Farms Partnership II | Merigold, MS 38759 | $66,141 |
45 | Hackberry Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $66,002 |
46 | Beulah Farming Company | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $64,016 |
47 | Bell Farms Partnership | Duncan, MS 38740 | $63,710 |
48 | Satterfield Farms | Benoit, MS 38725 | $63,062 |
49 | Pemble Farms Partnership II | Merigold, MS 38759 | $61,514 |
50 | 3-rock Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $60,271 |
51 | Kemba James | Mound Bayou, MS 38762 | $59,216 |
52 | Joyce Pitts | Mound Bayou, MS 38762 | $58,426 |
53 | Charles Chicorelli Jr | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $54,895 |
54 | Malatesta Farms, Inc. | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $54,201 |
55 | , | $52,754 | |
56 | Nancy Kent | Minter City, MS 38944 | $52,431 |
57 | Syndicate Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $52,305 |
58 | Aguzzi Farms A Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $51,230 |
59 | Game Inc | Rosedale, MS 38769 | $50,000 |
60 | C D Long Investments Partners Lp | Rosedale, MS 38769 | $50,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”