Total Commodity Programs in Calhoun County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 462
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Calhoun County, Mississippi totaled $2,471,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lewis M Bailey Iv Farms Partnership | Bruce, MS 38915 | $337,956 |
2 | Regions Bank ** | Grenada, MS 38901 | $135,203 |
3 | Topashaw Farms Partnership | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $121,872 |
4 | Kent Parker | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $84,168 |
5 | Steve Parker Farm | Big Creek, MS 38914 | $78,470 |
6 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $76,119 |
7 | Tony Morgan Farms Inc | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $70,952 |
8 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $65,767 |
9 | N & W Farms Inc | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $53,088 |
10 | Brent Parker | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $51,536 |
11 | Zachery C Brower LLC | Water Valley, MS 38965 | $49,327 |
12 | Tobin L Parker | Big Creek, MS 38914 | $48,562 |
13 | 4 E Farms Partnership | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $45,790 |
14 | Bradley Preston Mcgreger | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $43,631 |
15 | Guaranty Bank & Trust Co ** | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $43,335 |
16 | E-farm LLC | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $43,119 |
17 | Lenon R England | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $40,380 |
18 | Harvey L Hardin III | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $36,119 |
19 | George K Bingham | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $32,756 |
20 | Salinas Farms Inc | Bruce, MS 38915 | $30,574 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>