Total Commodity Programs in Calhoun County, Mississippi, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 95
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Calhoun County, Mississippi totaled $457,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $6,557 | |
22 | Harvey L Hardin III | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $6,493 |
23 | Robert T Dye | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $6,377 |
24 | , | $4,808 | |
25 | Peyton Cole Easley | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $4,728 |
26 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,703 |
27 | Carl Booth Denton Farm | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $2,685 |
28 | Dustin L Alexander | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $2,514 |
29 | Tamsie Morris | Houlka, MS 38850 | $1,972 |
30 | Wilson Farms LLC | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $1,853 |
31 | Andrew Landreth | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $1,698 |
32 | Michael Lucas Langley | Houston, MS 38851 | $1,530 |
33 | Jona Lurdes Salinas | Bruce, MS 38915 | $1,508 |
34 | Laderle Wayne Mayhan Jr | Charleston, MS 38921 | $1,369 |
35 | Jeff Bennett | Houlka, MS 38850 | $1,285 |
36 | Peyton Suber | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $1,219 |
37 | Na-jo Ranch LLC | Hattiesburg, MS 39402 | $1,180 |
38 | Robert Langston II | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $1,144 |
39 | Sandra Lucius | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $1,122 |
40 | Jasper W Doler | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $1,096 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”