Loan Deficiency in Calhoun County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 409
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Calhoun County, Mississippi totaled $3,716,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Darrell Bray | Houlka, MS 38850 | $4,170 |
102 | Kent Parker | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $4,163 |
103 | Deana S Ferguson | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $3,991 |
104 | Ruth S Sawyer | Memphis, TN 38117 | $3,985 |
105 | Perry V Bailey | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $3,983 |
106 | Joe Cowsert | Bruce, MS 38915 | $3,910 |
107 | Gary Hemphill | Gore Springs, MS 38929 | $3,895 |
108 | Cane Creek Farms Inc | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $3,756 |
109 | Seven-h Investments LLC | Starkville, MS 39759 | $3,260 |
110 | Fred Hartley | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $3,199 |
111 | Brent Parker | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $3,070 |
112 | Matelon Ferguson | Bruce, MS 38915 | $3,035 |
113 | Matthew Ray Bollinger | Bruce, MS 38915 | $2,993 |
114 | Don Easley | Abita Springs, LA 70420 | $2,950 |
115 | William D White | Big Creek, MS 38914 | $2,916 |
116 | Thomas Dunn | Bruce, MS 38915 | $2,866 |
117 | Coleman Mann | Bruce, MS 38915 | $2,854 |
118 | Sam E Countiss | Waurika, OK 73573 | $2,835 |
119 | Nathan Harrison | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $2,767 |
120 | Edward Mayhan | Bruce, MS 38915 | $2,677 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”