Total Conservation Programs in Claiborne County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 351
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Claiborne County, Mississippi totaled $13,687,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Daphne M Bruce | Madison, MS 39110 | $92,618 |
42 | R Geoghegan Clarke | Hattiesburg, MS 39402 | $87,209 |
43 | J B Allen Farms LLC | Jackson, MS 39206 | $85,013 |
44 | Mark Greer | Hermanville, MS 39086 | $84,274 |
45 | Carlisle Lane LLC | Pass Christian, MS 39571 | $78,672 |
46 | Oaklawn Farms Inc | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $76,070 |
47 | Grover W Hood | Clinton, MS 39056 | $74,373 |
48 | Golding Land Company LLC | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $72,742 |
49 | Roland H. Mikell | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $71,411 |
50 | Kimberly Sweet | Brandon, MS 39047 | $68,298 |
51 | James Hudson | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $64,560 |
52 | Guthrie Land Company LLC | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $61,977 |
53 | A F Gunn | Hermanville, MS 39086 | $54,508 |
54 | Edward B Fife Jr | Pattison, MS 39144 | $54,056 |
55 | Willie E Hood | Clinton, MS 39056 | $53,691 |
56 | Sharon L Hood | Clinton, MS 39056 | $50,373 |
57 | William Ryan Hood | Clinton, MS 39056 | $50,373 |
58 | Island Plantation Inc | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $50,204 |
59 | W D Starnes | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $48,960 |
60 | Lanelle B Hudson | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $48,772 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”