Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Coahoma County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 205
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Coahoma County, Mississippi totaled $5,124,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tnt Farms | Lyon, MS 38645 | $63,447 |
22 | Heaton Land Company II | Lyon, MS 38645 | $63,392 |
23 | Ancona Farms | Dundee, MS 38626 | $62,787 |
24 | Agostinelli Brothers Partnership | Lyon, MS 38645 | $54,430 |
25 | Westside Farms | Friars Point, MS 38631 | $54,336 |
26 | Limerick Farms II | Tunica, MS 38676 | $54,279 |
27 | Hbr Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $54,227 |
28 | H & H Farms | Lyon, MS 38645 | $52,988 |
29 | Lonesome Dove Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $52,312 |
30 | Agostinelli Farms Partnership II | Lyon, MS 38645 | $51,887 |
31 | Hughes Farms | Coahoma, MS 38617 | $51,065 |
32 | North Delta Farms | Lyon, MS 38645 | $48,943 |
33 | Ellendale Land Company | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $48,358 |
34 | Amright Farms | Sledge, MS 38670 | $47,835 |
35 | Rodgers Planting Co | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $47,702 |
36 | K & T Planting | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $47,182 |
37 | Connell Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $46,797 |
38 | Cross Road Farms | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $45,471 |
39 | Noe Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $45,115 |
40 | 1874 Farms | Sherard, MS 38669 | $44,860 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”