Total Conservation Programs in Coahoma County, Mississippi, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 462

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Coahoma County, Mississippi totaled $28,524,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
1Lake Charles Trees PartnershipClarksdale, MS 38614$1,165,750
2Jlk PartnershipHughes, AR 72348$1,152,847
3Duncan F WilliamsMemphis, TN 38138$1,071,330
4Emily Williams DunnMountain Brk, AL 35213$985,883
5Diamond Woods PartnershipBrickeys, AR 72320$966,669
6Allendale Planting CoShelby, MS 38774$896,656
7Johnson Planting CompanyLula, MS 38644$804,021
8James JenningsClarksdale, MS 38614$670,016
9Graeber Gibbes And Pitts EnterprisesMarks, MS 38646$650,260
10Graeber Caledonia TrustMarks, MS 38646$557,937
11Neely Farms L PGreenwood, MS 38930$546,535
12Duncan Williams Farm IncMemphis, TN 38138$519,650
13Virgil Rudolph Massey JrRussellville, AR 72802$497,880
14Spradling Brothers PartnershipClarksdale, MS 38614$482,566
15Charles B JohnsonLula, MS 38644$450,896
16Allen Johnson JrLula, MS 38644$450,896
17Two Two Farms IncGermantown, TN 38138$432,549
18Bowman Delta Farm LLCJackson, MS 39236$423,511
19George HirsbergClarksdale, MS 38614$385,066
20Rodney P GarrisonDundee, MS 38626$383,183

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag