Emergency Conservation Program in George County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 392
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in George County, Mississippi totaled $2,670,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John Peters III | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $13,518 |
42 | Ralph B Fairley | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $13,325 |
43 | Davey Edley Casey | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $12,541 |
44 | R Wayne Christian | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $12,531 |
45 | G B Smith Jr | Citronelle, AL 36522 | $12,301 |
46 | Albert Summers | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $12,140 |
47 | J E Pope | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $12,080 |
48 | John Thomas Bond | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $12,018 |
49 | Grover Havens | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $11,941 |
50 | Kyle Mccaskey | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $11,550 |
51 | Bayard D Mixon | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $11,518 |
52 | Edna Baker Roberts | Moss Point, MS 39563 | $11,456 |
53 | P'nutt Cooley | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $11,448 |
54 | James T Howell | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $11,219 |
55 | Larry A Havard | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $11,196 |
56 | Phillip Barnhill | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $10,780 |
57 | Steve Goff | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $10,700 |
58 | Stephen Maples | Perkinston, MS 39573 | $10,489 |
59 | Herman Mixon | Perkinston, MS 39573 | $10,346 |
60 | Ching Dairy | Semmes, AL 36575 | $10,274 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”