Farm Subsidy information
Greene County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Greene County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 597
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Greene County, Mississippi totaled $7,167,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Edward Pridgen | Leakesville, MS 39451 | $38,213 |
42 | Gordon Shaw | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $37,396 |
43 | Kenneth Williams | Neely, MS 39461 | $32,749 |
44 | Roy G Hicks Sr | Leakesville, MS 39451 | $32,450 |
45 | Tyson F Moreno | Leakesville, MS 39451 | $31,591 |
46 | Terrill Green | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $31,562 |
47 | Green Creek Tree Farm LLC | Brandon, MS 39042 | $31,137 |
48 | David Scoggins | Leakesville, MS 39451 | $30,004 |
49 | Ruby Mae Wade | Petal, MS 39465 | $29,688 |
50 | Franklin Wayne Hodges Jr | Leakesville, MS 39451 | $29,365 |
51 | Wallace C Smith | Richton, MS 39476 | $29,320 |
52 | David Brewer | Richton, MS 39476 | $28,669 |
53 | Ronald L Byrd | Richton, MS 39476 | $26,702 |
54 | Cecil J Williams | Mc Lain, MS 39456 | $25,888 |
55 | Wayburn D Smith Jr | Richton, MS 39476 | $23,966 |
56 | David Michael Courtney | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $23,318 |
57 | Daniel Scott Hicks | Leakesville, MS 39451 | $22,953 |
58 | C C Wade | Bogalusa, LA 70427 | $22,416 |
59 | Michael W Pridgen | Mobile, AL 36695 | $22,030 |
60 | William H Coaker Jr | Leakesville, MS 39451 | $21,269 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”