Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Grenada County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 125
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Grenada County, Mississippi totaled $416,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Yalobusha Farms Inc | Hattiesburg, MS 39404 | $6,177 |
22 | Grenada Separate School District | Grenada, MS 38902 | $4,701 |
23 | Spencer Alderman | Carrollton, MS 38917 | $4,692 |
24 | Raymona R James | Gore Springs, MS 38929 | $3,812 |
25 | Vance Farms | Grenada, MS 38902 | $3,672 |
26 | James David Conway | Winona, MS 38967 | $3,264 |
27 | Tobin L Parker | Big Creek, MS 38914 | $3,152 |
28 | Winter Land And Timber Investment | Frederick, MD 21701 | $2,832 |
29 | Carl Booth Denton Farm | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $2,806 |
30 | Higginbotham Farms | Germantown, TN 38139 | $2,184 |
31 | B Kyle Mills | Winona, MS 38967 | $2,170 |
32 | David Denton | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $2,046 |
33 | Margaret M Davis | Grenada, MS 38901 | $1,897 |
34 | Brent Parker | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $1,797 |
35 | Jeffrey R Tabb | Walthall, MS 39771 | $1,624 |
36 | Billy Frank James | Gore Springs, MS 38929 | $1,527 |
37 | George S Yeager Jr | Coffeeville, MS 38922 | $1,519 |
38 | Harrison Logging Inc | Grenada, MS 38901 | $1,497 |
39 | James E Shaw | Gore Springs, MS 38929 | $1,403 |
40 | Glen W White | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $1,382 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”