Farm Subsidy information
Grenada County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Grenada County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,077
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grenada County, Mississippi totaled $71,748,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bailey & Sons | Grenada, MS 38901 | $3,610,823 |
2 | Little & Little | Holcomb, MS 38940 | $3,243,530 |
3 | Robert Gary Clanton | Holcomb, MS 38940 | $2,056,934 |
4 | Ligon Farms Ptr | Grenada, MS 38901 | $1,931,846 |
5 | Melvin S Clanton Farm | Gore Springs, MS 38929 | $1,700,996 |
6 | Davis Farms | Grenada, MS 38901 | $1,656,512 |
7 | Marvin T Mims | Holcomb, MS 38940 | $1,233,581 |
8 | Triple S Farms | Holcomb, MS 38940 | $1,228,652 |
9 | D & S Farms | Philipp, MS 38950 | $1,194,297 |
10 | Tommy & David Hayward Partnership | Grenada, MS 38901 | $1,183,373 |
11 | Willow Brake Farms | Shelby, MS 38774 | $1,013,636 |
12 | Henry C Strider III | Philipp, MS 38950 | $1,002,814 |
13 | Davis & Davis Farms | Carrollton, MS 38917 | $921,372 |
14 | Delta Marsh Ltd | Batesville, MS 38606 | $910,242 |
15 | Bailey & Sons West | Grenada, MS 38901 | $856,404 |
16 | Larry Brad Mills | Winona, MS 38967 | $815,241 |
17 | Et Farms Of Mississippi | Madison, MS 39110 | $739,762 |
18 | W L Harris Jr | Holcomb, MS 38940 | $738,609 |
19 | Grant Farms Partnership | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $737,654 |
20 | Davis Farms J V | Philipp, MS 38950 | $709,748 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>