Farm Subsidy information
Grenada County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Grenada County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 275
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grenada County, Mississippi totaled $2,086,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bailey & Sons | Grenada, MS 38901 | $125,957 |
| 2 | Et Farms Of Mississippi | Madison, MS 39110 | $112,022 |
| 3 | Bailey & Sons West | Grenada, MS 38901 | $101,944 |
| 4 | Melvin S Clanton Farm | Gore Springs, MS 38929 | $71,318 |
| 5 | Regions Bank ** | Grenada, MS 38901 | $59,830 |
| 6 | Harrison Logging Inc | Grenada, MS 38901 | $55,869 |
| 7 | Jeff Harrison Trucking Inc | Gore Springs, MS 38929 | $52,875 |
| 8 | Tommy & David Hayward Partnership | Grenada, MS 38901 | $50,586 |
| 9 | Delta Marsh Ltd | Oxford, MS 38655 | $40,060 |
| 10 | Ligon Farms Ptr | Grenada, MS 38901 | $39,086 |
| 11 | Thomas S Usry | Grenada, MS 38901 | $38,874 |
| 12 | Robert Gary Clanton | Holcomb, MS 38940 | $37,636 |
| 13 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $34,894 |
| 14 | Robinson Farms Partnership | Grenada, MS 38901 | $31,676 |
| 15 | Lone Cypress LLC | Shelby, MS 38774 | $30,925 |
| 16 | Cannon Kirk | Grenada, MS 38902 | $29,439 |
| 17 | Rusty Mims | Holcomb, MS 38940 | $27,078 |
| 18 | Triple S Farms | Holcomb, MS 38940 | $21,520 |
| 19 | The Cleveland State Bank ** | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $20,120 |
| 20 | Rusty Mims | Holcomb, MS 38940 | $19,577 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf