Total Conservation Programs in Hinds County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 201
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Hinds County, Mississippi totaled $668,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Fowler Farms LLC | Madison, MS 39130 | $1,417 |
102 | Diamond53 LLC | Raymond, MS 39154 | $1,357 |
103 | Tri Agri Inc | Bolton, MS 39041 | $1,350 |
104 | Loretta F Baker | Utica, MS 39175 | $1,346 |
105 | Roy Lathem | Edwards, MS 39066 | $1,329 |
106 | Wildwood Farms LLC | Jackson, MS 39211 | $1,317 |
107 | Bobby Joe Van Etten | Edwards, MS 39066 | $1,316 |
108 | Donald Ray Van Etten | Edwards, MS 39066 | $1,316 |
109 | Billy R Mcfarland | Ridgeland, MS 39157 | $1,309 |
110 | John W Mcfarland | Ridgeland, MS 39157 | $1,309 |
111 | Tom C Fisher | Terry, MS 39170 | $1,299 |
112 | Atrice L Richard Family Trust | Fort Washington, MD 20744 | $1,282 |
113 | John Henry Mcnair | Crystal Springs, MS 39059 | $1,266 |
114 | Jewel Mcnair Carter | Pelahatchie, MS 39145 | $1,266 |
115 | Peggy Mckay | Pelahatchie, MS 39145 | $1,266 |
116 | Ernest Clark Mcnair Jr | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $1,266 |
117 | Daniel James Dorner | Belle Chasse, LA 70037 | $1,257 |
118 | Angela A Roth | Raymond, MS 39154 | $1,230 |
119 | Camille Francis | Dallas, TX 75243 | $1,227 |
120 | Thomas Brent Amacker | Dallas, TX 75205 | $1,227 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”