Farm Subsidy information
Hinds County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Hinds County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,598
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hinds County, Mississippi totaled $92,963,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mellon Farms Inc | Bolton, MS 39041 | $661,900 |
22 | Cal Maine Farms Inc | Bethune, SC 29009 | $589,607 |
23 | Gaddis & Mclaurin Inc | Bolton, MS 39041 | $585,382 |
24 | Robert Mashburn Farms Inc | Bolton, MS 39041 | $560,662 |
25 | Atwell Farms Inc | Norfolk, VA 23510 | $534,517 |
26 | Barton Farms LLC | Raymond, MS 39154 | $494,841 |
27 | Bryant Farms Inc | Jackson, MS 39211 | $455,153 |
28 | David C Barton | Raymond, MS 39154 | $454,763 |
29 | Curtis Massey Cattle Co., Inc. | Jackson, MS 39213 | $450,274 |
30 | Howard C Friday | Jackson, MS 39216 | $426,887 |
31 | Manassas Junction Company Inc | Jackson, MS 39205 | $410,521 |
32 | Clara S Kirkland | Clinton, MS 39056 | $382,266 |
33 | Joshua Burnell Carraway | Utica, MS 39175 | $373,422 |
34 | S Jan Chisolm | Clinton, MS 39056 | $335,775 |
35 | Three Lakes Farms Partnership | Vicksburg, MS 39183 | $333,401 |
36 | Rolling Hills Ranch Inc | Jackson, MS 39282 | $325,601 |
37 | Smith's Pecan Inc | Raymond, MS 39154 | $313,247 |
38 | Lee M Herren | Utica, MS 39175 | $312,838 |
39 | Ben N Walker | Clinton, MS 39056 | $312,815 |
40 | James N Brock | Jackson, MS 39212 | $297,469 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”