Farm Subsidy information
Humphreys County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Humphreys County, Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 188
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Humphreys County, Mississippi totaled $11,586,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Mary N Pinkerton Estate | Branson, MO 65616 | $4,200 |
122 | Ashers Acres Inc | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $3,967 |
123 | Nerren Brothers Planting Company LLC | Isola, MS 38754 | $3,938 |
124 | Edward Pinkston | Louise, MS 39097 | $3,816 |
125 | Gregory Ragland | Lexington, MS 39095 | $3,649 |
126 | Timothy L Davis | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $3,649 |
127 | The William H Mcmorrough Revocable Trust | Madison, MS 39110 | $3,557 |
128 | R Preston Aust Iv | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $3,446 |
129 | J C Morgan, LLC | Leland, MS 38756 | $3,284 |
130 | Arthur C Lamkin | Isola, MS 38754 | $3,271 |
131 | Sandra Cunningham | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $3,208 |
132 | Herbert Allen Jr | Silver City, MS 39166 | $2,991 |
133 | Larry Joe Mclendon | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $2,875 |
134 | The Oltremari Trust For Nicholas Adam Oltremari | Silver City, MS 39166 | $2,835 |
135 | Jerry D Peeples | Louise, MS 39097 | $2,831 |
136 | Velda M Peeples | Louise, MS 39097 | $2,831 |
137 | Dewey Wayne King Jr | Madison, MS 39110 | $2,741 |
138 | Willie E Love | Silver City, MS 39166 | $2,690 |
139 | William R Nichols | Indianola, MS 38751 | $2,571 |
140 | Earl Shanklin | Isola, MS 38754 | $2,553 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”