Farm Subsidy information
Issaquena County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 107
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $6,105,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Fitler Timber Co Inc | Rayville, LA 71269 | $31,914 |
22 | M C Ewing III | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $30,660 |
23 | T K Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $30,260 |
24 | Esperanza Planting Co | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $26,137 |
25 | Catledge Brothers Inc | Moss Point, MS 39563 | $25,862 |
26 | , | $25,046 | |
27 | Todd Heigle Farms Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $23,054 |
28 | Blt Corporation | Madison, MS 39110 | $21,145 |
29 | Hamlin And Hamlin N P | Grace, MS 38745 | $20,795 |
30 | Fins & Feathers LLC | Ocean Springs, MS 39564 | $20,270 |
31 | Leed's LLC | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $18,838 |
32 | Sarah Cutoff LLC | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $17,425 |
33 | Valley Park Plantation LLC | Vicksburg, MS 39181 | $16,351 |
34 | Willette Farms Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $15,075 |
35 | Tiffany D Kruger | Brandon, MS 39047 | $13,864 |
36 | Myresville A Mississippi Partnership | Greenville, MS 38701 | $13,821 |
37 | Kerr Farms Inc | Cary, MS 39054 | $13,721 |
38 | Walker Cottonwood Farms LLC | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $13,231 |
39 | Forest Glade Plantation | Grace, MS 38745 | $12,580 |
40 | John A Darnell Jr | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $11,245 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”