Loan Deficiency in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 203
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $8,690,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Woodruff Farms | Grace, MS 38745 | $123,752 |
22 | Lexington Cotton Producers Inc | Gulfport, MS 39503 | $120,304 |
23 | Hunter Farms | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $114,262 |
24 | Sunshine Farms Of Ms Inc | Brandon, MS 39043 | $110,820 |
25 | Clyde & Linda Nichols Farm | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $106,007 |
26 | Robert E Braxton Jr | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $104,679 |
27 | Albert Mahalitc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $101,265 |
28 | O J Sharpe Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $100,447 |
29 | Thomas Anthony Swarek | Gulfport, MS 39503 | $99,912 |
30 | Moore Company | Cary, MS 39054 | $98,043 |
31 | Boll Planting Co Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $96,761 |
32 | Clifton & Hope Porter Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $94,951 |
33 | Kenneth Hendrix Farm | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $84,700 |
34 | Garry & Dawn Nipper Ptrs | Chatham, MS 38731 | $81,961 |
35 | Jr Heigle Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $74,876 |
36 | Delaney Farms | Grace, MS 38745 | $74,214 |
37 | H & H Farms Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $72,744 |
38 | Paradise Farms Partnership | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $71,952 |
39 | Jack Kent | Minter City, MS 38944 | $71,327 |
40 | Kimberjay Oil & Gas Inc | Gulfport, MS 39501 | $70,689 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”