Deficiency Payment in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 107
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $657,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mary Elizabeth Kerr | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-841 |
62 | I S Lee Jr | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-875 |
63 | James Edward Newsom | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $-1,139 |
64 | Elige E Lewis Sr Estate | Jackson, MS 39206 | $-1,164 |
65 | L & R Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-1,250 |
66 | Tommy A Williams | Grace, MS 38745 | $-1,361 |
67 | Katie Jane Stuart | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-1,418 |
68 | Markel Todd Heigle | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-1,445 |
69 | Larry D Whitten | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $-1,500 |
70 | James A Hamlin | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-1,895 |
71 | William H Crawford | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-1,970 |
72 | Nuckolls Farm Inc | Higden, AR 72067 | $-2,171 |
73 | Carl P Clay | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-2,231 |
74 | Sable Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-2,930 |
75 | Hopedale Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-3,378 |
76 | Ronnie D Kerr | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-3,543 |
77 | James Franklin | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-3,824 |
78 | John V Lewis | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $-3,825 |
79 | Herman & Herman | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-3,861 |
80 | James T Mabus Estate | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $-3,891 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”