Deficiency Payment in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 107
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $657,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dennis Heigle Farms | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $-4,068 |
82 | Dunbar W Lee | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $-4,156 |
83 | Margie Delaney | Grace, MS 38745 | $-4,297 |
84 | Windham Farms Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-4,744 |
85 | Hollywood Farms | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $-4,795 |
86 | Agri-venture | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-5,050 |
87 | John M Lewis | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $-5,087 |
88 | Boll Planting Co Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-5,302 |
89 | Jr Heigle Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-5,316 |
90 | Charles L Delaney | Grace, MS 38745 | $-5,472 |
91 | Albert Mahalitc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-6,067 |
92 | Alps Plantation | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $-6,166 |
93 | Catledge Brothers Farm | Moss Point, MS 39563 | $-6,799 |
94 | Aden Farms | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $-7,026 |
95 | Johnson Farms | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $-7,248 |
96 | Clyde & Linda Nichols Farm | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $-7,670 |
97 | Hamlin And Hamlin N P | Grace, MS 38745 | $-7,792 |
98 | Clifton & Hope Porter Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-8,132 |
99 | Magnolia Plantation | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-8,849 |
100 | B & R Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $-9,453 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”