Total Disaster Programs in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 225
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $9,362,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Tommy Bowles | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $9,012 |
122 | Albert Mahalitc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $8,936 |
123 | Dennis Heigle Farms | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $8,798 |
124 | Donnie Bell | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $8,693 |
125 | Robert T Williams Dba W And W Far | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $8,645 |
126 | Tommy A Williams | Grace, MS 38745 | $8,604 |
127 | James Franklin | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $8,547 |
128 | Chris Mahalitc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $8,041 |
129 | Jimmy Roy Johnson | Satartia, MS 39162 | $7,953 |
130 | Rockin P Farms | Redwood, MS 39156 | $7,838 |
131 | Heigle Farms A Partnership | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $7,785 |
132 | Virgil Clay | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $7,663 |
133 | Rodney A Edwards Sr | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $7,082 |
134 | John V Lewis | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $7,038 |
135 | Kendric Proctor | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $6,885 |
136 | Thomas L Swarek | Gulfport, MS 39501 | $6,753 |
137 | Ewing Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $6,574 |
138 | Charles L Delaney | Grace, MS 38745 | $6,102 |
139 | Ronnie Kerr Farms Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $6,037 |
140 | John B Mcphail | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $5,916 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”