Farm Subsidy information
Issaquena County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 670
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $187,306,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | G M Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $8,392,382 |
| 2 | Esperanza Planting Co | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $6,795,122 |
| 3 | Buckshot Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $4,511,881 |
| 4 | Southern Agricultural Credit Corp ** | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $4,369,764 |
| 5 | Nipper Farms Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $3,699,380 |
| 6 | B & R Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $3,437,702 |
| 7 | Heigle Farms A Partnership | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $3,418,672 |
| 8 | Hamlin And Hamlin N P | Grace, MS 38745 | $3,380,017 |
| 9 | Japataha | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $3,339,667 |
| 10 | Aden Farms | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $3,188,723 |
| 11 | Bank Of Anguilla ** | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $3,186,380 |
| 12 | Valley Park Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $3,172,067 |
| 13 | Magnolia Plantation | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $2,217,652 |
| 14 | Jr Heigle Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $2,194,445 |
| 15 | O J Sharpe Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $2,112,693 |
| 16 | Alps Plantation | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $2,004,653 |
| 17 | Magnolia Plantation Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $1,770,168 |
| 18 | John M Lewis | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $1,714,868 |
| 19 | Delta Wildlife & Forestry Inc | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $1,583,947 |
| 20 | Top Dog Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $1,508,969 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
