Farm Subsidy information
Issaquena County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 644
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $174,984,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Chris Mahalitc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $820,850 |
| 42 | Ronnie D Kerr | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $798,892 |
| 43 | Haynes Farms Partnership | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $727,793 |
| 44 | Garry & Dawn Nipper Ptrs | Chatham, MS 38731 | $725,012 |
| 45 | Wynn Plantation A Partnership | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $714,622 |
| 46 | Willette Farms Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $670,523 |
| 47 | Herman & Herman | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $654,993 |
| 48 | Catledge Brothers Farm | Moss Point, MS 39563 | $654,630 |
| 49 | Larry & Lisa Nipper Ptrs | Chatham, MS 38731 | $646,970 |
| 50 | Hollywood Farms | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $642,994 |
| 51 | Valley Park Plantation LLC | Vicksburg, MS 39181 | $607,721 |
| 52 | Jesse Willis Jr | Vicksburg, MS 39183 | $607,480 |
| 53 | Art Arrington Farms | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $590,215 |
| 54 | Cottonwood Recreational Land Inc | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $578,985 |
| 55 | Albert Mahalitc Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $547,886 |
| 56 | Goza Farms | Grace, MS 38745 | $542,078 |
| 57 | Sam Farms Inc | Vicksburg, MS 39183 | $529,689 |
| 58 | Valewood Plantation LLC | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $525,130 |
| 59 | Sunshine Planting Company | Brandon, MS 39043 | $524,522 |
| 60 | Robert E Braxton Jr | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $519,824 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf