Total Conservation Programs in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 203
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $10,366,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mount Level Plantation LLC | Pearl, MS 39208 | $108,566 |
22 | Atwood Partners Lp | Vicksburg, MS 39181 | $102,088 |
23 | Egt Properties Lp | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $100,732 |
24 | Bradley D Whitten | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $99,992 |
25 | Cypress Brake Properties L P | Ridgeland, MS 39157 | $99,971 |
26 | W I Saint Sing Jr | Clinton, MS 39056 | $99,788 |
27 | William H Crawford | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $97,424 |
28 | Big Slough Hunting Club LLC | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $91,666 |
29 | Carl Mangrum | Greenville, MS 38702 | $86,636 |
30 | Cbd Land Lp | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $82,818 |
31 | Hollowell Merchantile Inc | Greenville, MS 38704 | $78,204 |
32 | Richard L Hawthorne | Clinton, MS 39056 | $71,162 |
33 | Richard B Hawthorne | Clinton, MS 39056 | $71,162 |
34 | Mississippi River Properties LLC | Jackson, MS 39207 | $69,740 |
35 | Charles Bert Darnell | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $65,161 |
36 | Buckshot Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $63,000 |
37 | Herman & Herman | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $60,665 |
38 | Blt Corporation | Madison, MS 39110 | $60,493 |
39 | Camille Thomas | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $58,874 |
40 | Clarence B Newman & Elizabeth P Newman Fam Trust | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $58,627 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”