Total Commodity Programs in Jackson County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 448
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Jackson County, Mississippi totaled $10,885,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tam N Tran | Diberville, MS 39540 | $12,000 |
62 | Thich Van Phan | Biloxi, MS 39532 | $12,000 |
63 | Liep V Tran | Biloxi, MS 39540 | $12,000 |
64 | Song Van Vu | Biloxi, MS 39540 | $12,000 |
65 | Vinh V Le | Biloxi, MS 39532 | $12,000 |
66 | Hai Ho | Ocean Springs, MS 39564 | $12,000 |
67 | Hung Phuoc Nguyen | Biloxi, MS 39530 | $12,000 |
68 | Thuong Van Nguyen | Biloxi, MS 39532 | $12,000 |
69 | Tam V Trieu | Diberville, MS 39540 | $12,000 |
70 | Mike Le | Ocean Springs, MS 39564 | $12,000 |
71 | Lorie Thu Trieu | Biloxi, MS 39540 | $12,000 |
72 | Tony Tho Nguyen | Biloxi, MS 39530 | $12,000 |
73 | Morris Glen Sekul | Biloxi, MS 39532 | $12,000 |
74 | Linh Tan Do | Biloxi, MS 39532 | $12,000 |
75 | Lucky Tommy II | Diberville, MS 39540 | $12,000 |
76 | Dau Van Nguyen | Pascagoula, MS 39568 | $12,000 |
77 | Thuong V Dang | Biloxi, MS 39532 | $12,000 |
78 | Hoi Van Nguyen | Biloxi, MS 39532 | $12,000 |
79 | Nhi Nguyen | Biloxi, MS 39530 | $12,000 |
80 | Lien Nguyen | Pass Christian, MS 39571 | $12,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”