Farm Subsidy information
Jefferson County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Jefferson County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 100
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jefferson County, Mississippi totaled $954,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Coles Creek Planting Company LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $155,464 |
2 | 3g Brothers Farms LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $80,911 |
3 | Tiolah Farms LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $74,846 |
4 | Blantonia Farms | Lorman, MS 39096 | $53,572 |
5 | Ray Smith Logging Inc | Fayette, MS 39069 | $52,875 |
6 | Lee Guedon Farms, LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $47,918 |
7 | Coles Creek Planting Company 2, LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $44,988 |
8 | Riverhills Bank ** | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $38,789 |
9 | Mike Guedon Farms LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $33,098 |
10 | Eg Farms LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $32,973 |
11 | Emile Guedon Farms LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $31,068 |
12 | Matthew Guedon Farms LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $28,481 |
13 | Louis Guedon Farms LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $17,156 |
14 | Blueskin Cattle LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $12,509 |
15 | Jimmie L Keys | Lorman, MS 39096 | $9,851 |
16 | Guedon Vegetables LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $8,942 |
17 | 600 LLC | Baton Rouge, LA 70808 | $8,469 |
18 | Burkley Farms Inc | Natchez, MS 39121 | $7,341 |
19 | Coles Creek Planting Co | Natchez, MS 39120 | $5,200 |
20 | James Allan Lane Jr | Fayette, MS 39069 | $5,092 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>