Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 126
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi totaled $447,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | B & S Farms | Prentiss, MS 39474 | $32,230 |
2 | Shelton Bernard Thompson | Prentiss, MS 39474 | $27,005 |
3 | Fred H Robinson | Newhebron, MS 39140 | $23,980 |
4 | English Farm Inc | Oak Vale, MS 39656 | $23,320 |
5 | Hollis English | Oak Vale, MS 39656 | $23,265 |
6 | Hickory Wood Farms LLC | Carson, MS 39427 | $21,241 |
7 | Melba Farms LLC | Ellisville, MS 39437 | $20,900 |
8 | Donald P Cole | Newhebron, MS 39140 | $19,800 |
9 | Clem Cattle Company Inc. | Mount Olive, MS 39119 | $16,885 |
10 | Virgil Mark Berry | Newhebron, MS 39140 | $9,295 |
11 | Donald Elliott Cole | Newhebron, MS 39140 | $9,020 |
12 | Andy Berry | Magee, MS 39111 | $7,810 |
13 | Rowland P Dyess | Bassfield, MS 39421 | $6,820 |
14 | James M Rogers | Prentiss, MS 39474 | $6,765 |
15 | Paul D Jones | Sumrall, MS 39482 | $6,160 |
16 | R Larry Rogers | Prentiss, MS 39474 | $5,445 |
17 | Michael J Pepper | Mendenhall, MS 39114 | $5,421 |
18 | James H Burnham | Sumrall, MS 39482 | $5,170 |
19 | Ottis Preston Williamson | Sumrall, MS 39482 | $5,170 |
20 | La'rue Sutton | Prentiss, MS 39474 | $4,840 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>