Total Conservation Programs in Lafayette County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 663
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Lafayette County, Mississippi totaled $12,073,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Ruth Conner Fristoe Revocable Tru | Atlanta, GA 30324 | $25,447 |
102 | Annie P Sharp | Oxford, MS 38655 | $25,312 |
103 | Baxter Jones | Water Valley, MS 38965 | $25,258 |
104 | Tom Hinton | Oxford, MS 38655 | $25,252 |
105 | Gibwin, LLC | Des Moines, WA 98198 | $24,714 |
106 | Ray Parker | Oxford, MS 38655 | $24,562 |
107 | Mac Construction, LLC | Oxford, MS 38655 | $24,520 |
108 | Thomas M Burns III | Covington, LA 70435 | $24,486 |
109 | Cathy A Jenkins | Taylor, MS 38673 | $24,205 |
110 | Langham Management Inc | Banner, MS 38913 | $24,135 |
111 | Leonard Monroe Kitchens | Oxford, MS 38655 | $24,108 |
112 | Juanita R Harwell | Oxford, MS 38655 | $24,097 |
113 | Jeannine Kaye C Moore | Sumner, WA 98390 | $24,045 |
114 | Inez B Parks | Columbus, MS 39705 | $23,965 |
115 | Billy W Beckwith Jr | Kilmichael, MS 39747 | $23,759 |
116 | Jimmy Ware | Winona, MS 38967 | $23,759 |
117 | The Wilson Group L P | Ridgeland, MS 39157 | $23,613 |
118 | Earl H Grissinger | Oxford, MS 38655 | $23,586 |
119 | Louis K Brandt | Houston, TX 77027 | $23,560 |
120 | John O'dell | Oxford, MS 38655 | $23,497 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”