Conservation Reserve Program in Lamar County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 206
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Lamar County, Mississippi totaled $4,338,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Randall L Anderson | Purvis, MS 39475 | $7,980 |
102 | Tommy E Aultman | Sumrall, MS 39482 | $7,950 |
103 | Alton Gale Robertson | Sumrall, MS 39482 | $7,950 |
104 | Louise T Bell | Kemah, TX 77565 | $7,733 |
105 | Susan H Williams Trust | Lumberton, MS 39455 | $7,580 |
106 | Malt Properties LLC | Purvis, MS 39475 | $7,540 |
107 | Cynthia S Holcomb | Purvis, MS 39475 | $7,431 |
108 | Deborah S Hamilton | Purvis, MS 39475 | $7,431 |
109 | Mary Williamson | Sumrall, MS 39482 | $7,384 |
110 | Thomas L Morris Md | Ruston, LA 71270 | $7,166 |
111 | Marcia Wright - 809 Beach Road Tree Farm LLC | Hattiesburg, MS 39402 | $6,855 |
112 | Sherrill High | Lumberton, MS 39455 | $6,828 |
113 | Clinton D Gipson | Lumberton, MS 39455 | $6,680 |
114 | Margaret Anderson | Purvis, MS 39475 | $6,642 |
115 | Charlene Scruggs | Sumrall, MS 39482 | $6,479 |
116 | Troy Brown Jr | Purvis, MS 39475 | $6,336 |
117 | Elsie Avery | Purvis, MS 39475 | $6,307 |
118 | James Mangum | Purvis, MS 39475 | $6,084 |
119 | Anita Self | Columbia, MS 39429 | $6,084 |
120 | Susan Baxter Bounds | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $5,850 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”