Farm Subsidy information
Lee County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Lee County, Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 215
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lee County, Mississippi totaled $4,315,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Nash Bottom Farms, Inc. | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $209,123 |
2 | Buster Brown Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $140,117 |
3 | Sand Creek Farms Inc | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $137,302 |
4 | Beech Bottom Farms, Inc. | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $120,235 |
5 | Sadie Ridge Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $113,947 |
6 | Brewer Bottom Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $102,923 |
7 | Pea Ridge Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $99,955 |
8 | Bucy Hill Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $98,592 |
9 | Murphy Top Farms, Inc. | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $97,639 |
10 | Clay Mask Dba Sweet Water Farms | Shannon, MS 38868 | $94,895 |
11 | River Creek Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $84,666 |
12 | Imc Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $79,551 |
13 | Bucy & Long Family Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $77,717 |
14 | Kenneth Oswalt | Plantersville, MS 38862 | $68,875 |
15 | Mac Reedy | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $54,995 |
16 | Letson Farms | Guntown, MS 38849 | $54,796 |
17 | Jamie Rogers | Plantersville, MS 38862 | $54,770 |
18 | Mccord Farms, LLC | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $53,095 |
19 | Paul L Sisk | Shannon, MS 38868 | $42,931 |
20 | H H Farms | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $38,801 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>