Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Lee County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 126
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Lee County, Mississippi totaled $272,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Arnold Woolven | Nettleton, MS 38858 | $2,498 |
42 | David Goggans | Shannon, MS 38868 | $2,498 |
43 | Kenneth E Hankins | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $2,498 |
44 | Bill Vaughan | Shannon, MS 38868 | $2,498 |
45 | James B Sisk II | Shannon, MS 38868 | $2,498 |
46 | William C Mattox Family Trust | Nettleton, MS 38858 | $2,498 |
47 | Bruce Sisk Sr | Shannon, MS 38868 | $2,498 |
48 | Hamilton S Smith Jr | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $2,498 |
49 | Ricky Presley | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $2,498 |
50 | Mcfarling Farms Partnership | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $2,498 |
51 | Everett Armstrong | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $2,493 |
52 | Tommy Buskirk | Shannon, MS 38868 | $2,493 |
53 | Thomas Young | Verona, MS 38879 | $2,493 |
54 | James A Carnathan | Mooreville, MS 38857 | $2,493 |
55 | Faye Payne | Plantersville, MS 38862 | $2,493 |
56 | M E Robison | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $2,493 |
57 | Edmond Ethridge Estate | Shannon, MS 38868 | $2,493 |
58 | Thomas A Buskirk | Shannon, MS 38868 | $2,493 |
59 | Gerald Williams | Guntown, MS 38849 | $2,493 |
60 | Hugh Bowles | Shannon, MS 38868 | $2,493 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”