Farm Subsidy information
Leflore County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Leflore County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 445
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Leflore County, Mississippi totaled $21,436,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dunn Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $150,319 |
22 | O F Bledsoe Pltn | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $149,944 |
23 | Buckshot Planting Co | Indianola, MS 38751 | $124,227 |
24 | Bc Farms | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $122,749 |
25 | Garry Makamson Farms | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $120,552 |
26 | Brad Tackett Farms | Sunflower, MS 38778 | $119,824 |
27 | Seek Farms | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $118,251 |
28 | Prestidge Farms II | Schlater, MS 38952 | $118,161 |
29 | Ashland Plantation | Schlater, MS 38952 | $102,677 |
30 | Sunnyside Planting Company | Holcomb, MS 38940 | $101,577 |
31 | The Jefferson Bank ** | Greenville, MS 38704 | $95,411 |
32 | Dlh Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $95,329 |
33 | Triangle Chemical Company Inc | Sycamore, GA 31790 | $92,280 |
34 | Southern Agricultural Credit Corp ** | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $90,120 |
35 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $87,820 |
36 | Christopher M Killebrew | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $79,641 |
37 | Saunders Farms II | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $77,749 |
38 | Mcmillan Acres | Minter City, MS 38944 | $73,088 |
39 | Ridgecrest Farms | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $72,966 |
40 | Bariola Farms Inc | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $72,227 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”