Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Leflore County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 355
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Leflore County, Mississippi totaled $46,160,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bank Of Commerce ** | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $5,000,363 |
| 2 | State Bank & Trust Company ** | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $2,410,355 |
| 3 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $2,297,124 |
| 4 | Arant Acres | Ruleville, MS 38771 | $2,176,427 |
| 5 | New Hope Farms | Schlater, MS 38952 | $1,314,123 |
| 6 | Prestidge Farms II | Schlater, MS 38952 | $1,240,650 |
| 7 | Guaranty Bank & Trust Co ** | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $1,165,833 |
| 8 | Twin Bayou Farms | Minter City, MS 38944 | $1,030,449 |
| 9 | Planters Bank & Trust Company ** | Indianola, MS 38751 | $1,001,527 |
| 10 | Bare Bones Farms | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $912,746 |
| 11 | Walter Pillow & Sons Planting Co | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $840,232 |
| 12 | Itta Bena Plantation III | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $786,046 |
| 13 | The Jefferson Bank ** | Greenville, MS 38704 | $744,357 |
| 14 | Sunnyside Planting Company | Holcomb, MS 38940 | $674,269 |
| 15 | River Bend Plantation | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $633,450 |
| 16 | Dunn Farms II | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $575,721 |
| 17 | Egypt Planting Company III | Cruger, MS 38924 | $555,205 |
| 18 | D & T Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $509,782 |
| 19 | Scott Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $506,981 |
| 20 | Buck Harris Planting Company | Cruger, MS 38924 | $504,496 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf