Total Conservation Programs in Madison County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,001
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Madison County, Mississippi totaled $46,076,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Cameron Plantation L P | Jackson, MS 39286 | $139,831 |
82 | Billy Mcmullen | Pickens, MS 39146 | $139,421 |
83 | Lee A Breeland Jr | Madison, MS 39110 | $138,164 |
84 | Barlow Properties Lp | Madison, MS 39110 | $136,886 |
85 | John Shelby Dendy | Pickens, MS 39146 | $136,805 |
86 | Jordan Family Limited Partnership | Madison, MS 39130 | $136,386 |
87 | Noah Jackson Family Properties LLC | Clinton, MS 39056 | $135,426 |
88 | J N L Land & Pine Lp | Madison, MS 39110 | $133,704 |
89 | William N Grogan | Jackson, MS 39236 | $130,903 |
90 | Dancing Coyote Ranch LLC | Madison, MS 39130 | $126,854 |
91 | Madison Timber Holdings LLC | New Orleans, LA 70130 | $125,058 |
92 | Jimmy W Eldridge | Jackson, MS 39209 | $125,048 |
93 | Breeland Family Partnership Lp | Madison, MS 39110 | $123,714 |
94 | James A Stewart | Daphne, AL 36526 | $123,593 |
95 | Crfc LLC | Ridgeland, MS 39157 | $123,258 |
96 | Phillip M Hinton | Madison, MS 39110 | $121,743 |
97 | Jerome Farms | Pickens, MS 39146 | $118,746 |
98 | Robert M Mayo Jr | Canton, MS 39046 | $118,359 |
99 | Ben L Mcmillon Jr | Madison, MS 39130 | $116,869 |
100 | Mary W Colbert | New Orleans, LA 70130 | $116,242 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”