Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Marshall County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 316
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Marshall County, Mississippi totaled $741,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Vernon Butler | Michigan City, MS 38647 | $8,695 |
22 | Mark Loftin | Red Banks, MS 38661 | $8,575 |
23 | Larry Carpenter Jr | Red Banks, MS 38661 | $7,709 |
24 | Bonnie P Byrd | Lamar, MS 38642 | $7,313 |
25 | National Audubon Society Inc. | Denton, NE 68339 | $7,264 |
26 | Ronald J Clayton | Hernando, MS 38632 | $6,762 |
27 | W O Fitch | Holly Springs, MS 38635 | $6,705 |
28 | Donald D Hunsucker Jr | Holly Springs, MS 38635 | $6,112 |
29 | Phillip E Malone | Byhalia, MS 38611 | $5,861 |
30 | Frank S Elgin | Holly Springs, MS 38635 | $5,746 |
31 | Charles Thomas | Holly Springs, MS 38635 | $5,700 |
32 | Jackson H Wittjen | Holly Springs, MS 38635 | $5,490 |
33 | Liberty Hill Farms Partnership | Somerville, TN 38068 | $5,073 |
34 | H & B Farms | Holly Springs, MS 38635 | $5,038 |
35 | Jody Mcminn | Potts Camp, MS 38659 | $4,885 |
36 | Stanley Hurdle Sr | Lamar, MS 38642 | $4,807 |
37 | Timothy S Bolden | Ashland, MS 38603 | $4,581 |
38 | Hurdle Farms Family Partnership | Rossville, TN 38066 | $4,450 |
39 | Mike Mason | Michigan City, MS 38647 | $4,194 |
40 | John Hugh Miller Estate | Holly Springs, MS 38635 | $4,190 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”