Farm Subsidy information
Marshall County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Marshall County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,793
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marshall County, Mississippi totaled $92,782,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Raymond Patrick | Senatobia, MS 38668 | $304,525 |
62 | Charles N Dean Farms | Memphis, TN 38138 | $299,590 |
63 | Donald Mitchell | Holly Springs, MS 38635 | $292,105 |
64 | Yarbrough Brothers Land & Cattle | Dallas, TX 75247 | $290,029 |
65 | Sam Beesinger Jr | Collierville, TN 38027 | $288,756 |
66 | Tommy Heath Byrd | Lamar, MS 38642 | $284,700 |
67 | Buchanan Farms | Holly Springs, MS 38635 | $282,645 |
68 | Edward S Felsenthal | Memphis, TN 38119 | $270,336 |
69 | John H Miller | Waterford, MS 38685 | $268,859 |
70 | Montyne T Sammons | Collierville, TN 38017 | $262,116 |
71 | Gary Barnett | Holly Springs, MS 38635 | $260,928 |
72 | Casanova Real Estate Family Ltd P | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $257,259 |
73 | William B Cox | Arlington, TN 38002 | $255,195 |
74 | Pineyridge Farms LLC | Southaven, MS 38671 | $251,784 |
75 | Brandon Allen | Lamar, MS 38642 | $246,561 |
76 | Faye B Devore | Holly Springs, MS 38635 | $239,884 |
77 | Larry Carpenter | Mount Pleasant, MS 38649 | $238,164 |
78 | Matthew Palmer | Holly Springs, MS 38635 | $237,349 |
79 | Tommy Byrd | Lamar, MS 38642 | $236,508 |
80 | H & B Farms | Holly Springs, MS 38635 | $228,450 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”