Total Conservation Programs in Monroe County, Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 185
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Monroe County, Mississippi totaled $670,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tim F Best | Aberdeen, MS 39730 | $3,175 |
62 | Billy G Sisk | Okolona, MS 38860 | $3,090 |
63 | Millard L Loden | Amory, MS 38821 | $3,046 |
64 | Haney Properties Lp | Aberdeen, MS 39730 | $3,015 |
65 | Gwendolynn W Barrett Of Sub A Of Gwendolynn H Barr | Greenville, SC 29605 | $2,986 |
66 | Leigh B Mobley Share Of Sub A Of The Gwendolynn H | Aberdeen, MS 39730 | $2,986 |
67 | John T Barrett III Share Of Sub A Of Gwendolynn H | Madison, MS 39110 | $2,983 |
68 | Vickie C Holman | Hamilton, MS 39746 | $2,982 |
69 | Margaret Maute Higgins | Mountain Brk, AL 35213 | $2,809 |
70 | Renasant Bank ** | Prairie, MS 39756 | $2,728 |
71 | James R Dabbs | Amory, MS 38821 | $2,722 |
72 | Ronald L Raigins | Prairie, MS 39756 | $2,529 |
73 | Ben Hill | Okolona, MS 38860 | $2,405 |
74 | Ellis Jaudon | Greenwood Springs, MS 38848 | $2,369 |
75 | Floyd Wayne Fowlkes | Amory, MS 38821 | $2,315 |
76 | Jim Byrd | Prairie, MS 39756 | $2,302 |
77 | Monroe Kut Incorporated | Aberdeen, MS 39730 | $2,293 |
78 | Dean Minga | Greenwood Springs, MS 38848 | $2,216 |
79 | Bruce A Mazat | Aberdeen, MS 39730 | $2,174 |
80 | Elizabeth T Cooper | Aberdeen, MS 39730 | $2,174 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”