Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Montgomery County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 140
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Montgomery County, Mississippi totaled $413,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James David Conway | Winona, MS 38967 | $6,761 |
22 | Nathan F Crenshaw | Winona, MS 38967 | $6,055 |
23 | Shirley Dance | Winona, MS 38967 | $5,227 |
24 | Stephen Rex May | French Camp, MS 39745 | $5,195 |
25 | Harvey L Hardin III | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $5,005 |
26 | C & E Farms Partnership | Coffeeville, MS 38922 | $4,828 |
27 | Keith Mcgee | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $4,697 |
28 | Carroll Hemphill Farms | Gore Springs, MS 38929 | $4,315 |
29 | Robert Kent Johnson | Kilmichael, MS 39747 | $4,107 |
30 | D W Clark | Kilmichael, MS 39747 | $3,544 |
31 | B Kyle Mills | Winona, MS 38967 | $3,281 |
32 | James Myron May | Stewart, MS 39767 | $3,200 |
33 | Ronald Robertson | Winona, MS 38967 | $3,058 |
34 | Mulberry Farms LLC | Batesville, MS 38606 | $2,980 |
35 | Betty A Robinson | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $2,362 |
36 | Rhonda M Boyle | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $2,056 |
37 | Betty Dianne Dale | Grenada, MS 38901 | $1,855 |
38 | Dixie Marie Dale | Grenada, MS 38901 | $1,855 |
39 | Rex A May | Stewart, MS 39767 | $1,848 |
40 | Mike E Woods | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $1,784 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”