Total Commodity Programs in Montgomery County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 692
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Montgomery County, Mississippi totaled $33,301,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James Myron May | Stewart, MS 39767 | $224,997 |
42 | T & J Thomas Farms | Winona, MS 38967 | $222,991 |
43 | Jeffery Dean Robinson | Carrollton, MS 38917 | $217,103 |
44 | Walter R Oliver | Winona, MS 38967 | $212,912 |
45 | Betty A Robinson | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $207,966 |
46 | Carroll Hemphill Farms | Gore Springs, MS 38929 | $192,888 |
47 | Melvin S Clanton Farm | Gore Springs, MS 38929 | $176,091 |
48 | Ronald Robertson | Winona, MS 38967 | $157,641 |
49 | Kirk Partnership | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $142,148 |
50 | Double R Cattle LLC | Winona, MS 38967 | $137,202 |
51 | Brooks Jones | Winona, MS 38967 | $126,180 |
52 | Betty J Mills | Winona, MS 38967 | $112,930 |
53 | Mike E Woods | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $111,096 |
54 | Rhett Oliver | Winona, MS 38967 | $100,831 |
55 | Waugh & Waugh | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $96,822 |
56 | The Hugh And Reba Mcwilliams Revo | Madison, MS 39110 | $96,760 |
57 | Robinson Farms Partnership | Grenada, MS 38901 | $91,344 |
58 | James David Conway | Winona, MS 38967 | $86,711 |
59 | Frances S Dale | Grenada, MS 38901 | $78,744 |
60 | Paul G Beck | Winona, MS 38967 | $75,416 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”