Farm Subsidy information
Panola County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Panola County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,794
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Panola County, Mississippi totaled $305,426,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jeffrey F Lipscomb | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $518,844 |
102 | W & W Planting Co LLC | Senatobia, MS 38668 | $513,618 |
103 | M & H Farms Partnership | Enid, MS 38927 | $497,087 |
104 | William T Hawks | Washington, DC 20003 | $495,892 |
105 | Thomas G And Miriam B Hamer Living Trust | Dyersburg, TN 38024 | $491,792 |
106 | Hal Renfro | Crowder, MS 38622 | $485,013 |
107 | Thomas Gin Company | Batesville, MS 38606 | $482,050 |
108 | Orchard Farms Jv | Dallas, TX 75231 | $476,794 |
109 | Jerry A Morrisson | Etta, MS 38627 | $472,282 |
110 | Andrea L Smith Md | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $471,755 |
111 | Grover C Lawson Jr | Sardis, MS 38666 | $471,196 |
112 | Barry Simmerman | Batesville, MS 38606 | $460,850 |
113 | Double A Farms Inc | Batesville, MS 38606 | $457,953 |
114 | Maribeth Haire | Batesville, MS 38606 | $457,051 |
115 | Oscar E Gilliland | Como, MS 38619 | $456,307 |
116 | Harriet H Boyle Grantor Trust | Memphis, TN 38187 | $449,113 |
117 | Wilburn Cannon | Batesville, MS 38606 | $445,502 |
118 | Sylvia Strock | Como, MS 38619 | $442,702 |
119 | Jh Farms LLC | Batesville, MS 38606 | $442,321 |
120 | Kingwood Farms LLC | Pope, MS 38658 | $438,814 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”