Farm Subsidy information
Panola County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Panola County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 717
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Panola County, Mississippi totaled $10,101,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Yoctall Planting Company LLC | Batesville, MS 38606 | $73,588 |
22 | James Russell | Batesville, MS 38606 | $72,430 |
23 | Hal Renfro | Crowder, MS 38622 | $68,847 |
24 | Grady Short Farms | Sardis, MS 38666 | $62,524 |
25 | Macedonia Farms LLC | Batesville, MS 38606 | $61,292 |
26 | Stone Corner Farms | Batesville, MS 38606 | $59,251 |
27 | Ernest Vaughan | Batesville, MS 38606 | $56,703 |
28 | James R Vaughan | Batesville, MS 38606 | $55,851 |
29 | Jh Farms LLC | Batesville, MS 38606 | $52,189 |
30 | Kendall Alexander | Batesville, MS 38606 | $50,094 |
31 | Ballentine Farms Partnership | Sardis, MS 38666 | $48,432 |
32 | Beard Farms | Sardis, MS 38666 | $47,518 |
33 | Anne P Kennedy | New Orleans, LA 70118 | $47,184 |
34 | Webb Trucking LLC | Sardis, MS 38666 | $47,168 |
35 | Stan Holcombe | Senatobia, MS 38668 | $43,514 |
36 | Robert Ferrell | Batesville, MS 38606 | $40,633 |
37 | Triple R Land Company LLC | Collierville, TN 38017 | $40,053 |
38 | Lucia W Crenshaw | Memphis, TN 38117 | $39,828 |
39 | Mickey Aldridge | Batesville, MS 38606 | $39,606 |
40 | Chickasaw Farms | Como, MS 38619 | $38,602 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”