Farm Subsidy information
Pontotoc County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Pontotoc County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 221 to 240 of 2,907
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pontotoc County, Mississippi totaled $96,378,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
221 | Sheila S Crew | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $76,624 |
222 | Hancock Creek Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $76,394 |
223 | Shirley T Lowry | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $76,098 |
224 | Shirley Bridge Staten Revocable T | Collierville, TN 38017 | $75,612 |
225 | James H Homan | Shannon, MS 38868 | $75,051 |
226 | Jone Coggins | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $74,324 |
227 | Ward Warren | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $74,155 |
228 | J T Swords | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $74,080 |
229 | Bradley Montgomery | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $73,992 |
230 | Goldleaf Farms I, LLC | Ball Ground, GA 30107 | $73,284 |
231 | C G Gaston Jr | Thaxton, MS 38871 | $73,030 |
232 | Hazel V Johnson | Houlka, MS 38850 | $72,919 |
233 | Lee W Hatcher | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $72,663 |
234 | James W Russell | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $72,023 |
235 | Martha M Ray | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $71,946 |
236 | Poe Planting Co LLC | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $71,920 |
237 | Jerry Loden | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $71,872 |
238 | James D Patterson | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $71,528 |
239 | Jimmy F Roye | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $70,949 |
240 | Lois Cochran Umfress Revocable Trust | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $70,898 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”