Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Quitman County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 249
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Quitman County, Mississippi totaled $4,048,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Christian M Bland | Sledge, MS 38670 | $12,184 |
82 | Lonesome Dove Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $11,666 |
83 | Mabry Farms LLC | Batesville, MS 38606 | $11,340 |
84 | Jim Johnson Farms | Sardis, MS 38666 | $10,651 |
85 | Marlon Farms II | Lyon, MS 38645 | $10,631 |
86 | Pittman & Company Farms LLC | Sledge, MS 38670 | $10,612 |
87 | Imbeau Bayou Plantation LLC | Athens, AL 35611 | $10,189 |
88 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $10,168 |
89 | Michael D Mixon | Lambert, MS 38643 | $10,061 |
90 | Hal Renfro | Crowder, MS 38622 | $9,083 |
91 | Hunt Shellman | Sardis, MS 38666 | $9,034 |
92 | Fred Zepponi III | Dundee, MS 38626 | $8,934 |
93 | Planters Bank & Trust Company ** | Indianola, MS 38751 | $8,910 |
94 | Guaranty Bank & Trust Co ** | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $8,742 |
95 | Nu Agronomic Concepts | Friars Point, MS 38631 | $8,482 |
96 | John Moyer | Marks, MS 38646 | $8,399 |
97 | M & H Farms Partnership | Enid, MS 38927 | $8,326 |
98 | Gladys B Ross | Ovilla, TX 75154 | $8,209 |
99 | James E Daniel Jr | Tunica, MS 38676 | $8,189 |
100 | Jesse Rotenberry | Lambert, MS 38643 | $8,060 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”