Farm Subsidy information
Sharkey County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Sharkey County, Mississippi, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 142
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sharkey County, Mississippi totaled $10,224,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Moore Company | Cary, MS 39054 | $47,500 |
22 | Sojamax Inc | Jackson, MS 39236 | $45,921 |
23 | Wilda Grace Mcdonald Janes | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $43,534 |
24 | , | $41,870 | |
25 | Sandy Bayou Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $41,758 |
26 | Nicholson Farms Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $40,836 |
27 | Evans Planting Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $39,794 |
28 | , | $37,528 | |
29 | Hamaka Farms LLC | Jackson, MS 39215 | $37,504 |
30 | Joseph Reeves - Joseph And Natach'e Reeves Revocab | Grapevine, TX 76051 | $36,824 |
31 | John L Mcpherson Jr | Columbus, MS 39701 | $36,066 |
32 | Robert Lee Mcpherson | Columbus, MS 39701 | $36,066 |
33 | Flamingo Farms LLC | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $36,051 |
34 | Helena Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $35,625 |
35 | Missipco LLC | Carmel, IN 46032 | $34,422 |
36 | Delta City Planting Company | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $34,296 |
37 | Clinkscales Associates | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $32,156 |
38 | Cary Associates | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $30,875 |
39 | Allicat Farms Inc | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $29,471 |
40 | Greenhaven LLC - Ana L Lampton Mbr | Jackson, MS 39215 | $28,467 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”