Market Gains in Sharkey County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 89
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Sharkey County, Mississippi totaled $7,263,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kenneth Hendrix Farm | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $107,014 |
22 | Caselli Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $99,304 |
23 | J & L Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $94,019 |
24 | Bonnie Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $85,236 |
25 | Millenium Planting Company A Ms G | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $80,943 |
26 | Patterson & Sons Partnership | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $77,704 |
27 | Mont Helena Associates | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $76,295 |
28 | Martin Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $71,541 |
29 | Panther Creek Plantation | Leland, MS 38756 | $68,441 |
30 | Coghlan & Sons | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $62,354 |
31 | Leroy V Frey | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $60,268 |
32 | Radash Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $59,047 |
33 | Winslow Farms Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $58,877 |
34 | Wayne And Teresa Lloyd Partnershi | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $58,078 |
35 | Sharkey Planting Company | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $57,957 |
36 | Hargrave Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $57,823 |
37 | Winslow & Cummins Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $52,731 |
38 | Thomas V Scott Jr | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $45,917 |
39 | Ms Delta Partnership | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $43,091 |
40 | Kenneth E Goodman Jr | Jackson, MS 39211 | $34,897 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”