Total Commodity Programs in Sharkey County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 575
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sharkey County, Mississippi totaled $218,977,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Cameta | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $1,447,304 |
42 | C & J Smith Farms Inc | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $1,414,638 |
43 | Panther Creek Plantation | Leland, MS 38756 | $1,407,422 |
44 | Holly Grove Partnership | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $1,249,229 |
45 | Clinkscales Associates | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $1,237,035 |
46 | Caney Bayou Farms Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $1,188,417 |
47 | Southern Agricultural Credit Corp ** | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $1,119,829 |
48 | Sabill Farms | Cary, MS 39054 | $1,041,016 |
49 | Bonnie Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $1,006,126 |
50 | Mud Lake Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $993,900 |
51 | Seward & Son Planting Company | Louise, MS 39097 | $977,522 |
52 | W G B Inc | Delta City, MS 39061 | $956,007 |
53 | Caselli Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $945,440 |
54 | Martin Plantation | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $944,215 |
55 | Sullivan & Sullivan | Ozark, MO 65721 | $925,105 |
56 | Sandy Bayou Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $915,632 |
57 | Gary Ellis | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $885,815 |
58 | Double E Farms Inc | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $842,759 |
59 | Radash Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $807,991 |
60 | Wood Land Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $806,633 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”