Total Commodity Programs in Sharkey County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 109
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sharkey County, Mississippi totaled $5,187,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | O K Farms Inc | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $30,451 |
42 | B & R Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $29,244 |
43 | Planters Bank & Trust Company ** | Indianola, MS 38751 | $29,195 |
44 | Mark B Dill | Neosho Rapids, KS 66864 | $29,173 |
45 | Seward & Son Planting Company | Louise, MS 39097 | $29,005 |
46 | Cca Properties LLC | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $27,567 |
47 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $26,687 |
48 | S & R Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $23,875 |
49 | First Service Bank ** | Dermott, AR 71638 | $23,321 |
50 | Peyton King Dba K & K Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $21,721 |
51 | Kenneth Hendrix Farm | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $21,504 |
52 | Alsop Landing Inc | Delta City, MS 39061 | $20,582 |
53 | Ralph W Mcgee Dba Mcgee Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $20,028 |
54 | Halzac Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $19,407 |
55 | P & J Farms Partnership | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $18,944 |
56 | Albert Mahalitc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $18,096 |
57 | Johnson Brothers Farms Inc | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $17,943 |
58 | Clark Planting Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $17,721 |
59 | B & H Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $17,017 |
60 | Little Panther Plantation | Leland, MS 38756 | $16,789 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”