Farm Subsidy information
Sharkey County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Sharkey County, Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 167
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sharkey County, Mississippi totaled $8,575,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Cold Harbor Company Inc | Jackson, MS 39211 | $12,790 |
82 | Ruth A Bowlin | Memphis, TN 38119 | $12,496 |
83 | Linda H Dallas | Clinton, MS 39056 | $12,197 |
84 | James C Carr III | Jackson, MS 39216 | $11,861 |
85 | Durst & Durst | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $11,144 |
86 | Nickel Land Management LLC | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $11,068 |
87 | M James Chaney Jr | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $10,822 |
88 | Jimmy D Barnes | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $10,522 |
89 | Charles E Scott | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $10,516 |
90 | , | $10,413 | |
91 | Charles J Janes Jr | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $9,709 |
92 | Lws Farm LLC | Lumberton, MS 39455 | $9,570 |
93 | , | $9,086 | |
94 | Halzac Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $8,421 |
95 | Mark B Dill | Neosho Rapids, KS 66864 | $8,352 |
96 | Kin Growers | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $8,282 |
97 | W G Boykin Lands Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $8,062 |
98 | Mary E Huff | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $7,991 |
99 | Seward & Son Planting Company | Louise, MS 39097 | $7,855 |
100 | Dean Dean & Dean | Panther Burn, MS 38765 | $7,829 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”