Farm Subsidy information
Sharkey County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Sharkey County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 725
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sharkey County, Mississippi totaled $297,424,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | C & B Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $3,168,607 |
| 22 | Little Panther Plantation | Leland, MS 38756 | $3,118,776 |
| 23 | Sharkey Planting Company | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $2,912,766 |
| 24 | Rkb Farms Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $2,471,328 |
| 25 | Dean Dean & Dean | Panther Burn, MS 38765 | $2,414,234 |
| 26 | Howle Planting Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $2,339,332 |
| 27 | Hollingsworth & Company | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $2,334,041 |
| 28 | L & R Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $2,308,217 |
| 29 | Delta City Planting Company | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $2,261,315 |
| 30 | Neff Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $2,137,193 |
| 31 | J & L Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $2,069,144 |
| 32 | Goodman Associates | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $2,034,687 |
| 33 | Sysco Farms Partnership | Delta City, MS 39061 | $1,972,290 |
| 34 | J & B Farms | Vicksburg, MS 39183 | $1,956,850 |
| 35 | Ralph W Mcgee II | Leland, MS 38756 | $1,897,365 |
| 36 | Patton Farms Joint Venture | Nitta Yuma, MS 38721 | $1,819,738 |
| 37 | Clark And Clark Partnership | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $1,793,644 |
| 38 | Helena Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $1,752,560 |
| 39 | Evans Planting Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $1,734,180 |
| 40 | Clinkscales Associates | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $1,566,455 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf